News Article

When I first heard about a way to run your car using nothing but the standard water/H2O you find in your tap, needless to say I was incredibly skeptical. With high gas prices the way they are these days, this seemed like the kind of information I would have heard on the news, because it appeared to be a way to run your can on water using nothing but a small engine addition that you build yourself. It took me a while to realize that one of the reasons I had never heard about this before was because the oil companies and the government have done whatever they could to keep this thing silenced.

This technology uses parts available at almost any hardware or automotive shop. Using detail instructions found in the many guides, you can use your car or truck’s battery and create a hydrogen powered hybrid that will use HHO gas to save you thousands of dollars in high gas prices as well as help clean up the environment.

This system is known as HHO gas, and it uses a converter to discharge hydrogen directly from standard water and use it for fuel. Essentially, your car’s power is coming from both gas and water, making it a makeshift hybrid car. The technology is so simply that people rarely sell the equipment - instead, they tend to simply sell guides, as these guides are good enough to allow any individual to create it themselves rather than be forced to pay the huge markup costs.

How Safe Is It? Incredibly safe. In fact, unlike standard hydrogen gas, which is incredibly combustible, this type of HHO gas cannot explode at all. That is because the HHO gas used in this system is only created when your engine needs it, otherwise it is still stored as water. Since water is not combustible, this gas is not combustible, so there is absolutely no risk to your safety.

In addition, these systems are also able to help your engine reduce its own stress because HHO gas acts like a coolant, providing your engine with the cool air it needs to prevent it from warming up. So not only do you get higher gas mileage when you run your car on water, you also receive a great deal of other benefits as well, such as less maintenance costs.

Does Technology Work With All Car Types? HHO technology not only works with cars. It works with trucks, scooters - even lawn mowers. With the exception of electric hybrids (only because they have not been tested yet) the systems can be guaranteed to run any vehicle more fuel efficiency when that vehicle depends on gasoline to work properly. SUV’s, campers - no matter what type of gas mileage they got previously or what kind of car they are, they can all free themselves of high gas prices using an HHO system.

If you look online, you will find a couple hybrid conversion manuals surfacing as this innovative, environmental friendly solution spreads and as the price of gas continues to soar. If you think that gas prices will drop, you are only fooling yourself. Be careful when choosing a manual as well since not all are legit. Make sure to check the Alexa rankings of the websites, as you will see the proven manuals ranked under 20K. This is because word-of-mouth has garnered massive traffic because the technology works!

If you want to reduce the impact you have on the environment and stop paying such high prices for gasoline, you can do so by running your car with water. The process to create the machinery is incredibly simply and inexpensive, and it is now easy for just about anyone to convert their car into a water powered hybrid. Don’t let the big oil companies win this battle. Convert your car today.

It is understandable that many people have doubt that you can run your car on water. In fact, in many ways, they are right. Currently there is no affordable car on earth that can run entirely on water, and converting your car to run on nothing but water is probably a million dollar investment in time and research. There is, however, a way to turn your own car into an incredibly inexpensive hydrogen powered hybrid car, simply by adding some home made machinery that you can easily create yourself.

It’s possible for this technology to work because it uses simple parts that are available at most hardware stores. These parts facilitate the use of power from your auto’s battery to break-apart water molecules into HHO gas. From there, the gas is then propelled into the intake of your car / truck, making a more efficient and clean burn for your gas.

This system is known as HHO gas, and it uses a converter to discharge hydrogen directly from standard water and use it for fuel. Essentially, your car’s power is coming from both gas and water, making it a makeshift hybrid car. The technology is so simply that people rarely sell the equipment - instead, they tend to simply sell guides, as these guides are good enough to allow any individual to create it themselves rather than be forced to pay the huge markup costs.

How Safe Is It? Incredibly safe. In fact, unlike standard hydrogen gas, which is incredibly combustible, this type of HHO gas cannot explode at all. That is because the HHO gas used in this system is only created when your engine needs it, otherwise it is still stored as water. Since water is not combustible, this gas is not combustible, so there is absolutely no risk to your safety.

When you decide to power your car with water, the full will be free of combustible gas as well as keep your engine healthy. Your engine will experience relief from stress, and your car will be able to last much longer thanks to this alternative fuel method. You will not only be saving money on gas, you will also be saving money on car maintenance.

Does Technology Work With All Car Types? HHO technology not only works with cars. It works with trucks, scooters - even lawn mowers. With the exception of electric hybrids (only because they have not been tested yet) the systems can be guaranteed to run any vehicle more fuel efficiency when that vehicle depends on gasoline to work properly. SUV’s, campers - no matter what type of gas mileage they got previously or what kind of car they are, they can all free themselves of high gas prices using an HHO system.

There are several manuals featuring ways to create a hydrogen powered car. They represent possibly the only chance of allowing you to save money on gas in the short term. And since gas prices are simply not going to decrease any time in the near future, investing in one of these manuals has the potential to save you thousands of dollars each year you use the system. They are growing in popularity every day, and it’s time for you to consider utilizing their amazing potential soon.

If you want to reduce the impact you have on the environment and stop paying such high prices for gasoline, you can do so by running your car with water. The process to create the machinery is incredibly simply and inexpensive, and it is now easy for just about anyone to convert their car into a water powered hybrid. Don’t let the big oil companies win this battle. Convert your car today.

In fact, it can be very dangerous IF you don’t elect to use your brain! Hydrogen or any gas system using hydrogen is not something to mess around with! I’ve heard of some idiots that have tried to ignite hydrogen as a means of amusement… DUMB! “Well, I just needed to see if it would go up in flames,” one woman stated. Of course it ignites, duhh? Hydrogen will blow-up if you put fire of any kind to it and rest assured it will fan rapidly.

Throughout the “Run your Car on Water” conversion manual that I used, there were ample precautionary notes, for all areas that have the capability to harm you or destroy your automobile. Especially when it came to things like toxic glues, etc.., the conversion manuals author placed distinct warnings that it’s impossible to overlook.

Alright, with that behind us, Hydrogen-On-Demand technology is not anymore more dangerous than conventional car technologies that involve fuel, cooling, etc. For example, everyone knows the radiator is a must to cool-down regular engines. Without it’s use, your car would smoke till it dies!

But, if you open the radiator cap when it’s smoking hot, you will get burned, right? The problem is not in the radiator by itself, the problem is in lack of awareness and carelessness. There are simple safety rules and it’s necessary to understand and apply them.

When undertaking this easy conversion of your car to make it run on water, follow the extensive guidelines in the conversion manual. If you do this, it would be very hard to hurt yourself. I’ve never heard of or experienced any explosions or meltdowns. For safety, follow the step-by-step manual word for word!

Allow me to provide you a real-life example. In one of the chapters on installation, you will observe that you must keep the output hose at minimum four feet in length in order to prevent fire dangers. Never cut it short even if the device is closer than four feet. Sure, this may waste a couple bucks, but saves loads of trouble! Every precaution is highlighted in the extensive “Run your Car with Water” conversion manual so it’s very hard to miss.

Its vital to note, Hydrogen-On-Demand /Water Fuel is not the same as stored Hydrogen! In traditional systems, it uses all the hydrogen that is produced immediately. Hydrogen storage tanks are non-existent since we don’t want explosions if a car accident occurs. The water fuel advances have proven to be MUCH SAFER than hydrogen cars or natural gas autos.

Contrary to popular belief, it is not hazardous for your car / truck at all. Many have noted that they have seen their gas mileage increase by as much as 100% after implementing the hybrid conversion, too.

A recurrent complaint in government is the entrenched nature of elected office. Elect a candidate to office, particularly for a second term, and he/she is probably there for a very long time. The power of the incumbent is well known, and the concern about incumbents is that they tend to move away from their own consciences, away from the needs of the voters and , and into the orbit of the big money peddlers.

More than one state has dealt with this concern by limiting the number of terms an official may serve. After so many years, you aren’t eligible for re-election. So far, except for the presidency, this effort has failed at the Federal level.

Some of the pundits are very concerned about this movement. The conservative thinker Burke argued that politics is a skill like any other. Just as you would not want an inexperienced surgeon operating on you or your family, so you would not want a novice elected official deciding on far-reaching laws and policy. Every newly elected official will say that the job is far more complicated than they imagine, and that most of the first first term is consumed by simply ‘learning the ropes’. Real mastery of the process can take a decade or more.

Currently in Louisiana, our own term limits have just started kicking in, producing a madhouse turnover of the legislative branch, and a loss of all real seniority. The consensus among the pundits is that the winners here will be the lobbyists: they are the only ones left with any long-term experience in state policy. Shifting from incumbent to lobbyists, somehow, does not seem to be what reformers were aiming for.

There is a second problem in the political landscape, however: left vs right, republican vs. democrat. It seems that everyone is trying so hard to win out over the other side, that no one is interested win-win solutions. Beating the opponent has become more important than serving the majority. In the nasty fighting over bragging rights, it seems that the cooperative American spirit has been completely lost.

Let me offer an idea that could address both problems: Extensible Limits. After the normal time of limited service, a candidate might be allowed to run again– IF the body in which he/she has served concurs, (by private vote of course). Each re-election would become increasingly difficult; the first Extension might require a 50% vote, the next, an additional 3%, and a required 3% increase for each successive re-election.

For the chief officer, perhaps the House and the Senate would both have to grant permission.

Net effect? Increased leadership and collaboration, decreased politics and partisanship. Every freshman representative will be confronted with a long-range choice. Play hardball, take your three strikes, and leave the arena. Or, completely abandon the sports mentality, where ‘win-win’ does not exist, and begin collaborating; begin LEADING.

And the Good ol’ boys will find quickly find themselves in the political unemployment line. The damage they cause will be very limited.

The elected officials who have the wisdom and the patience to build our country– and our world– will see their political strength increase rapidly. And all of them, the length of their service, and the height of their influence, will correlate directly with the effort, passion, and intelligence they bring to the job.

First of all, a disclaimer: I tend toward the liberal more often than the conservative. Having said that, I don’t generally read liberal commentators, but almost always read George F. Will, a highly-respected conservative editorialist.

My reasons for reading Will are simple: George usually gives good reasons for his arguments. Agree or not, I can see a logic to his conclusion.

But more important to me, George is an independent thinker. He is unafraid of disagreeing with other conservatives, and he will criticize elected conservatives. This independence is sorely lacking in the world, although it is very much needed. I mistrust anyone who always agrees with their party, regardless of their political stance.

However, I disagree with a current topic that George has taken up. He contends that higher education is dominated by liberals, and improperly so.

As a way of contrasting and comparing, consider that the US Military is the best-funded branch of government. If you add the Veterans Administration to that, Military funding increases significantly. Well, the men and women of the Armed Services, and the many businesses that support the Military, are conservative– by a wide margin. So we need to ask why that political disparity isn’t a concern.

Large corporate interests now influence our private time, by constantly advertising their services and products to us. Most of the entertainment and news outlets are now also owned by large business, and critics constantly decry the loss of independence in news. Big businesses are run and staffed by people who, not surprisingly, are almost all conservative. So here is an enormous educational counterbalance to our colleges, and one that influences us from cradle to grave, not just for 4 years. But there is no outcry about that.

And then there is the Church. The Religious Right says it all: serious church-goers are dominated by conservatives, who call on The Almighty Himself to counter the liberal universities. How could our institutions of higher learning ever expect to stand up to that? But partisan leanings in our churches don’t appear to bother conservatives.

So we have to ask Mr. Will if his concern about an influential part of American becoming too partisan? Or is he just worried that it aligns with the other party?

With that, we need to consider analytical thinking, critical to America, but also to the doctrine of Free Will. If teenagers and young adults only experience conservative concepts then have we circumvented their Free Will? If our students are not exposed to liberal ideas, have we extinguished the student’s ability to think objectively, in order to serve contemporary (and possibly transitory) political ideas?

That’s an important point. Before and after college, corporate advertising and corporate news will be the main sources of information for our citizens. So if our young people aren’t exposed to liberal ideas in college, when will they consider them? When else will they get an opportunity to truly reflect on different ideologies and decide– decide for THEMSELVES– what they believe?

George Will cannot argue that we should deny students the same democratic freedoms, and the same religious freedoms, that he exercises.

Nor can he argue that this arrangement has hurt the democracy. Even though liberals dominate higher education, the electorate regularly alternates between the two parties, and the two political stances… suggesting that, in fact, they are sufficiently exposed to different ideas, that they are thinking for themselves; and that exposure to different doctrines produces a stronger, not a weaker, citizen.

Finally, if we consider what ‘conservative’ means– to conserve, to lean toward the traditional, to advocate the tried-and-true– then it is clear that our colleges absolutely must be liberal. If institutions of higher learning are, by design, our places of innovation, of theorization, and of experimentation, then it becomes clear that it is precisely the mission of the university to challenge the status quo.

Of course higher education is liberal. That is its job.

So with all due respect to Mr. Will, I would hope that he stops criticizing our universities for being liberal. If they were not liberal, they– and we– would not be doing our jobs.